At around a quarter of a second, WP Engine was able to deliver outstanding loading times that were much faster than the outcomes from our contrast of the Bluehost, HostGator and SiteGround budget shared hosting strategies, although these plans were more affordable – Price Monthly. Nevertheless, WP Engine likewise performed much better than the test website in our Kinsta review, revealing that WP Engine can hold their own against other hosts in the same rate bracket.
With more than 450,000 sales to date, a long list of features and multiple site demonstrations, it’s not difficult to see why Avada is so popular. Price Monthly. However, all of this functionality can have a large effect on site speed, making Avada a good candidate for testing how well WP Engine can manage more heavyweight WordPress websites.
(click to enlarge) For this WP Engine loading time test, the Avada style was installed and its Firm website demo was imported. Again, the filling times were recorded by Pingdom at 30-minute intervals over a 7-day duration. The average load time for the WordPress website utilizing the Twenty Seventeen theme was 1.43 seconds.
Since of this, the filling times were less impressive. However, thinking about the selection of features utilized on the Avada Firm demo homepage, these times are nothing to grumble about. That said, they’re not rather as fast as the times recorded in our Kinsta hosting review. Not everybody who selects a multipurpose theme such as Avada will use its demonstration sites precisely as they are.
For this post, the outcomes were better, with a typical loading time of 898 milliseconds, compared with the 1.43 seconds of the Firm homepage demo. A blog post produced with the Avada style and used in our Pingdom performance screening. (click to enlarge) Therefore, if you plan to use a feature-rich WordPress theme such as Avada, it’s well worth investing a long time testing what impact the various demonstrations, page components and widgets have on your packing times prior to launching your website.
While you may not wish to use a style as basic as the light-weight Twenty Seventeen, you most likely will not use among the demos as-is from a heavyweight multipurpose theme such as Avada either. For that reason, if your website strikes an excellent balance in between functions and functionality, you might enjoy loading times someplace in between those experienced by our test sites.
(click to expand) When setting up our test websites with WP Engine, they were set up on the servers in their European information center. Since of this, the European screening location was selected in Pingdom. Although you can choose which data center your site is hosted in, with alternatives all around the world, the range your visitors are from the website will have an impact on the filling times they experience.
Packing times are a helpful method to judge the quality of a web host, but it’s also crucial to get an idea of how your website will perform when numerous visitors are accessing it at the same time. For this part of our WP Engine review, we used the Load Effect service to simulate numerous users at the same time accessing the WP Engine-hosted WordPress website (Price Monthly).
The loading times of the website were tape-recorded by Load Effect at routine periods to see how well the site carried out as the visitor numbers grew. Again, the multipurpose Avada style was used on the test site. The Load Impact test shows that the WP Engine-hosted website was able to manage 250 simultaneous virtual users without any drop in efficiency.
The results are readily available on the Load Impact site if you want to know more about the test. Comparable outcomes were taped when testing the Kinsta managed WordPress hosting, with 250 synchronised virtual users having no influence on the efficiency of the test site. Nevertheless, our tests of the budget hosting from Bluehost, GoDaddy and HostGator exposed that all three had problems with more than 50 virtual users accessing the sites at the very same time.
Downtime, no matter how little, can have a very unfavorable influence on the effectiveness of your website. Durations of unavailability can make your website and, by extension, you look less than professional and unreliable, resulting in missed out on opportunities and a negative reputation. Neither of our sites hosted with WP Engine experienced any downtime during the seven-day testing duration.
If your website does experience less than the agreed uptime levels, you can get credit towards your monthly charges. Price Monthly. As you can see, WordPress sites hosted by WP Engine have the prospective to load rapidly, and handle multiple simultaneous visitors with minimal downtime. But how much do you have to spend for this type of service? There are three predefined WP Engine hosting strategies to pick from, as well as a custom option that’s ideal for sites receiving millions of visitors a month, or those who require to host a minimum of 25 WordPress sites on one account.
When it concerns the predefined WP Engine hosting plans, your choices are as follows: $35 monthly for one WordPress site, up to 25K visits and 10 GB bandwidth monthly, with 10 GB of storage. $115 per month for 5 WordPress sites, up to 100K gos to and 200 GB bandwidth each month, with 20 GB of storage.
As pointed out earlier in this WP Engine review, all plans include access to the 35-plus WordPress styles from StudioPress and a complimentary SSL certificate. You also have the choice of setting up more WordPress websites on your prepare for an extra $20 monthly per website. Nevertheless, all of your sites will be sharing the resources readily available on your plan, such as the bandwidth and storage allowances.
No matter which of the predefined plans you choose, your WordPress sites will be hosted on the same kind of hardware. Therefore, whether you’re paying $35 or $290 monthly, you must have the ability to delight in comparable performance levels to our test websites. Obviously, your site setup and traffic levels will play a big part in determining how well your websites carry out.
With each plan having limitations on bandwidth and visitor numbers, you may be wondering what takes place if you review your allowance (Price Monthly). If this does take place, clients on the Startup, Development, or Scale strategies will incur an excess cost of $2 per 1,000 additional month-to-month visitors. You can find out more about these charges and how WP Engine count visitors on this page.
The additional features, such as automatic backups, security scanning, and WordPress updates, must take a few of the stress of handling a website. Likewise, having access to more than 35 top quality premium WordPress styles helps to offset a few of the expense of hosting your site with WP Engine. The user friendly developer-friendly features, such as the development and staging environments, as well as the ability to transfer websites to clients, are more reasons to think about WP Engine.
Although in the same region as a lot of the other leading managed WordPress hosting companies, paying $35 per month or more isn’t understandable for every single site. However, if your site creates income, is essential to your business or is outgrowing your existing host, it makes good sense to add WP Engine to your shortlist.
Joe is a skilled WordPress user who takes pleasure in sharing the tips and knowledge he’s chosen up from utilizing this wonderful platform for several years. You can discover more about Joe on his site.